Skip to main content

Obama is a Steelers Fan??

Okay, so I heard on the news President Obama is rooting for the Pittsburgh Steelers tomorrow in the Super Bowl. As a Steelers fan, I think that's just great. Whoopee. But frankly I don't think the President should be taking sides in something like the Super Bowl unless a.) one of the teams is from his hometown, or b.) one of the teams is the Washington Redskins. That's the only excuse for a President to show any kind of partisanship toward a sports team in something as big as the Super Bowl.

It sounds to me like he's just trying to keep his bread buttered in Pennsylvania, where he won a somewhat unlikely victory in the election a few months ago. Add to that the fact that he did not manage to carry the state of Arizona, and probably will not ever carry it, and you see why he might have an interest in rooting for Steel City.

BUT...most of the PA counties the Obama won were in the Eastern part of the state, and therefore more likely to be Philadelphia Eagles fans. The Western PA counties, which are most likely to be Steelers fans, went almost totally for McCain. If you're an Eagles fan, you probably don't like the Steelers much, in fact you probably hate them. There's no "we're all from Pennsylvania" feeling there. So, not only is Obama kind of spitting in the eye of the region of PA that got him elected, but he's kowtowing to a region who voted, en masse, for his opponent. Net benefit? Zero. It just sounds like more campaigning, which he doesn't need to do right now. He's the President of the whole country.

The President, in my estimation, is supposed to be above this kind of thing. He should've offered some sort of benevolent, birds-eye-view analysis of the game, to show he's a good Sports-Following American Man. But I still want to come away from the whole thing thinking he's got better things to do than choose sides in the Super Bowl:

"Well, the Steelers obviously have the superior defense. Ahhh....Mr. Polomalu is fine, fine athlete. But...I think the Cardinals have some... potent offensive weapons in their arsenal as well, such as, ah, Mr. Warner and Mr. Fitzgerald, and I'm sure it's going to be a great game for fans on both sides of the aisle...I mean country. I'm sure I'll manage to tune in for a few minutes Sunday night."

For a President who has run his campaign on bi-partisanship and reaching across the aisle, was it really a wise move to pick sides in the biggest game of the biggest sport in the biggest sports-crazy country in the world? It might not do him any harm, but it's definitely not going to win him any supporters.

Okay so, big deal, right? Well, people in this country place a big importance on sports, and most are better versed in sports than politics. I just think from a political perspective, it was not a smart move.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #146: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Issue: May 9, 2016

Story: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Rating: $

Review: I feel like this is a somewhat tired technique, straight out of Creative Writing 101: write a story consisting of three or four different snapshots or snippets out of a character's life at different ages, sort of like a series of written photographs. Fun perhaps, but strikes me as a bit amateurish. However, I also think L'Heureux succeeds here by pushing it a bit further, playing with the character's tentative attempts at something close to faith -- in childish, adult, and mature adult ways -- and tying all three "Short Moments" together in a subtle and readily decipherable way.

L'Heureux's prose and his frank humor and his ability to glorify and find the meaning in the mundane events and thoughts of every day life, and thereby turn the life of an ordinary person into a drama with meaning and significance puts me in mind of John Irving. As well a…

Water Review: San Pellegrino 250ml Bottle

Damn you, tiny little bottle of San Pellegrino. So little. So cute. But what are you really good for other than to make me wish I had a full bottle of Pellegrino? 
Good as a palate cleanser after a nice double espresso, I will give it that. But little else. The suave yet chaotic burst of Pellegrino bubbliness is still there, but with each sip you feel the tragedy of being that much closer to the end of the bottle, that much faster.

This is a bottle of water made specifically for the frustrated, for the meticulous, for the measurers among us with a penchant for the dainty. This water does not love you in the wild, on a sunny porch or with the raucous laughter of friends. No...much the opposite. Whatever that may be.

Best drunk in tiny, tiny sips, while forcing oneself through an unreadable and depressing Russian novel one does not want to read but feels one should, on a cold, wet day in December that promises four months of gloom and depression...or in pairs or threes and poured over …

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…