Skip to main content

Movie Review: Midnight in Paris

I recently saw the latest Woody Allen movie, Midnight in Paris. I have to say it was better and more engaging than any of what I'd refer to as the later Woody Allen films (those from the past ten years or so), other than Melinda and Melinda, which I really dug. In the words of a good friend of mine, "It made me smile."

As far as the film's moral scope, its statement on life, I'd have to refer to the main character Gil's (Owen Wilson's) own words in the film: "I'm having an insight. It's not that big of an insight, but it's an insight none the less" [sic].

This film partly takes place during one of my favorite periods of history: Paris in the 1920s. In the film, Gil runs into the likes of Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Picasso, Dali, T.S. Elliot, and others. These characters don't serve any real function in the plot, except to show Gil that even back in the "idyllic" age of the 1920s, people still had problems and even longed for what they felt was a "simpler" and "more romantic" age. In addition, it was just really, really fun to see the likes of Hemingway and Dali brought to life, though the Fitzgerald character was a little bit forgettable.

Other highlights:

1.) Woody Allen's films tend to take place in these very rich, luxurious, upper-middle-class worlds inhabited by smart, beautiful, well-dressed people with baroque problems. And frankly, for that reason, his worlds are really fun to escape into. In this film, the characters dine out every night, go to roof-top wine tastings, debate buying $30,000 living room chairs, discuss months-long vacation plans and international business ventures, etc., etc. In other words, their world is very, very far removed from most of our own. But watching that world is like slipping into a warm bath. It's nice to know that someone, somewhere, is living that life, or that someone still believes that life is worth aspiring to.

2.) Rachel McAdams looks absolutely fabulous. I've always thought she was gorgeous, but she just keeps getting better and better looking. And in this film, they really dolled her up nicely. The film was almost worth it just for the chance to watch her in a white cotton sun-dress and wedge heels, prancing around an outdoor museum beside the comparatively frumpy Wilson.

3.) Hemingway's rants on writing and life are dead-on. You know, the "good writing is true writing," kind of thing. Who knows if Hemingway actually spoke like he does in the film (there simply can't be many people left who knew him back in the 20s), but if there was a way to bring his well-documented writing philosophy to life, Woody Allen did it. His little rants were not only spot-on, but they really struck a chord and made me want to go back and re-read my Hemingway.

In short: If I had it to do over again, I might just wait until the film came out on DVD. If it weren't for the draw of seeing the 1920s Paris people on screen, I might've done just that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #146: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Issue: May 9, 2016

Story: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Rating: $

Review: I feel like this is a somewhat tired technique, straight out of Creative Writing 101: write a story consisting of three or four different snapshots or snippets out of a character's life at different ages, sort of like a series of written photographs. Fun perhaps, but strikes me as a bit amateurish. However, I also think L'Heureux succeeds here by pushing it a bit further, playing with the character's tentative attempts at something close to faith -- in childish, adult, and mature adult ways -- and tying all three "Short Moments" together in a subtle and readily decipherable way.

L'Heureux's prose and his frank humor and his ability to glorify and find the meaning in the mundane events and thoughts of every day life, and thereby turn the life of an ordinary person into a drama with meaning and significance puts me in mind of John Irving. As well a…

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…

Water Review: San Pellegrino 250ml Bottle

Damn you, tiny little bottle of San Pellegrino. So little. So cute. But what are you really good for other than to make me wish I had a full bottle of Pellegrino? 
Good as a palate cleanser after a nice double espresso, I will give it that. But little else. The suave yet chaotic burst of Pellegrino bubbliness is still there, but with each sip you feel the tragedy of being that much closer to the end of the bottle, that much faster.

This is a bottle of water made specifically for the frustrated, for the meticulous, for the measurers among us with a penchant for the dainty. This water does not love you in the wild, on a sunny porch or with the raucous laughter of friends. No...much the opposite. Whatever that may be.

Best drunk in tiny, tiny sips, while forcing oneself through an unreadable and depressing Russian novel one does not want to read but feels one should, on a cold, wet day in December that promises four months of gloom and depression...or in pairs or threes and poured over …