Skip to main content

Cord Count: 12

My daily life requires twelve (12) different cords. When did things get so f**king complicated? I didn't even count the cords to items like my lamps or the fridge or the vacuum cleaner (not that I actually use it). No, these 12 are cords that I tend to have to tote around with me every day for all of my various and sundry phones, iPods, computers, etc. Not all at once, mind you. But seriously, this is ridiculous.

Read the list below and see if it doesn't this make you long for a simpler time....a time when you had to be home for someone to reach you on the phone, and you had to wait like a week to find out if your photos were any good, and people weren't glued to electric screens for 85% of their waking hours. Was it that long ago? Aye. Life moves pretty fast these days, and a man loses count.

At any one time my life requires:

2 Phone chargers (one with usb, one plain old charger)
1 laptop charger
1 iPod usb/charger cord
1 hands free cell phone ear piece cord
1 pair ear buds (cord attached)
1 pair head phones (cord attached)
1 Kindle usb/charger cord
1 camera usb cord
1 camera battery re-charger cord
1 car audio iPod cord
1 iPod-to-stereo cord (the red/white plug thing)

So, is this just the rant of another reluctantly reformed Luddite bemoaning the loss of "the good old days"? Or maybe simply a man who came of age just close enough before the late 90s tsunami of technology to remember a simpler time and be forever ill-at-ease with modern life? Or even still just a frank assessment of how goddamned complicated daily life has become in 2012 vs., let's say, 1992?

One thing's for sure: there's no going back. As long as Modern Civilization stays intact (and, well, your guess is as good as mine how long that'll go on) we're not going back to the pre-cellphone, pre-internet days. And frankly, I'm a direct beneficiary of the convenience of the Information age. The internet and advanced telecommunications have allowed guys like me to have careers, work at home for long stretches of time, be able to get work into the public eye in a vast number of media outlets that wouldn't have otherwise existed were it not for the net.

In a creative field where attention -- essentially -- is the main goal, the modern age enables me to get that and to gain the kind of traction that before would've cost me years or an entire lifetime to earn. Has there been a real material benefit to all this? Well, let's just say I'm still waiting for the checks to come in. BUT, I'm still writing and getting my stuff seen by people regularly, and that's because of the convenience of the internet.

But, lest we lose sight of the main point of this rambling post: Modern life requires far too many cords.


XaviarAlex said…
Mr. Catton, I believe that there was a distinct and almost parabolic growth of technology in the last 20 years. The funny thing is, in my opin. is that actually we aren't technologically superior enough now or what will be in the near future. By this I mean, is the cords you carry, like I carry, really should be obsolete by now. Why? NASA, the government, and many other groups COULD create better technology. They choose not to (or at least sell it to the masses). Why? So that when the latest iPad comes screaming out we all go crazy over it. Government and the powers that be really don't want us to advance too quickly with better technology--really ecofriendly, etc. Social progress prevents their parabolic growth of returns, if you will. Anyways, I'm ranting. On a computer. Find me though some day, with tech I need, not want--and I do believe I may get that simpler dream. Or not.

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review: "The Apologizer" by Milan Kundera

Issue: May 4, 2015

Rating: $$

Review: It took me five years and three separate attempts to finish Milan Kundera's famous novel, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, but in spite of that, quotes and insights from that book still rattle round my head on a weekly basis. What I mean to say is: my feelings on Kundera are very similar to my feelings on Haruki Murakami. I enjoy reading his work, but in small doses, like this short story.

Like Murakami, Kundera uses elements of magical realism, but where in a Murakami story you might encounter a flying dolphin or a disappearing hotel or a person who has lived his whole life in the same room, refusing to leave, Kundera's magical realism offers more direct insights and perspective on real life.

In Kundera's worlds, time and space are malleable and everything that ever happened in history is happening at the same time, and the narrator is a completely omniscient, caring, witty, and hands-on god-like being.

And so it is with "The Apo…

New Yorker Fiction Reviews: "Meet the President!" by Zadie Smith

Each week I review the short fiction from a recent issue of The New Yorker. If you told me when I was 12 that I'd be doing this I'd have been like, "Dork. There's no such thing as blogs," and I'd have been right...

Issue: Aug. 12 & 19, 2013

Story: "Meet the President!"

Author:Zadie Smith

(Please note: I've developed a highly sophisticated grading system, which I'll be using from now on.  Each story will now receive a Final Grade of either READ IT or DON'T READ it. See the bottom of the review for this story's grade...after you've read the review, natch.)

Plot: Set in England, far into the future (lets say 2113) a privileged youth of 15, named Bill Peek, encounters a few poor villagers from a small, abandoned coastal town on the southeast shore. He meets a little girl named Aggie, who is going to her sister's funeral. Peek is cut-off from real life by a sophisticated video game system that is implanted in his head, therefore th…

A Piece of Advice I Learned From My Grandfather

My grandfather was one of the most learned men I know. He read widely and voraciously, and not just in the sciences (he was a doctor); he loved politics, philosophy, and great literature as well. Whenever he finished a book he would write his thoughts about the book in the front cover and then sign and date it. To this day every once in a while I will open a book from my bookshelf or my mother's bookshelf, or at one of my family members' homes, and there will be my grandfather's handwriting. He was also a great giver of his books; if you remarked that you liked a particular one or wanted to read it, you were almost sure to take it home with you.

Reading is a very solitary pursuit but my grandfather was not a solitary person. He relished having family and friends around him which is convenient because he was blessed with a lot of both. And he carried out his intellectual life in a very "public" way as well. He was, in some ways, an intellectual evangelist. If he r…