Skip to main content

Cord Count: 12


My daily life requires twelve (12) different cords. When did things get so f**king complicated? I didn't even count the cords to items like my lamps or the fridge or the vacuum cleaner (not that I actually use it). No, these 12 are cords that I tend to have to tote around with me every day for all of my various and sundry phones, iPods, computers, etc. Not all at once, mind you. But seriously, this is ridiculous.

Read the list below and see if it doesn't this make you long for a simpler time....a time when you had to be home for someone to reach you on the phone, and you had to wait like a week to find out if your photos were any good, and people weren't glued to electric screens for 85% of their waking hours. Was it that long ago? Aye. Life moves pretty fast these days, and a man loses count.

At any one time my life requires:

2 Phone chargers (one with usb, one plain old charger)
1 laptop charger
1 iPod usb/charger cord
1 hands free cell phone ear piece cord
1 pair ear buds (cord attached)
1 pair head phones (cord attached)
1 Kindle usb/charger cord
1 camera usb cord
1 camera battery re-charger cord
1 car audio iPod cord
1 iPod-to-stereo cord (the red/white plug thing)

So, is this just the rant of another reluctantly reformed Luddite bemoaning the loss of "the good old days"? Or maybe simply a man who came of age just close enough before the late 90s tsunami of technology to remember a simpler time and be forever ill-at-ease with modern life? Or even still just a frank assessment of how goddamned complicated daily life has become in 2012 vs., let's say, 1992?

One thing's for sure: there's no going back. As long as Modern Civilization stays intact (and, well, your guess is as good as mine how long that'll go on) we're not going back to the pre-cellphone, pre-internet days. And frankly, I'm a direct beneficiary of the convenience of the Information age. The internet and advanced telecommunications have allowed guys like me to have careers, work at home for long stretches of time, be able to get work into the public eye in a vast number of media outlets that wouldn't have otherwise existed were it not for the net.

In a creative field where attention -- essentially -- is the main goal, the modern age enables me to get that and to gain the kind of traction that before would've cost me years or an entire lifetime to earn. Has there been a real material benefit to all this? Well, let's just say I'm still waiting for the checks to come in. BUT, I'm still writing and getting my stuff seen by people regularly, and that's because of the convenience of the internet.

But, lest we lose sight of the main point of this rambling post: Modern life requires far too many cords.

Comments

XaviarAlex said…
Mr. Catton, I believe that there was a distinct and almost parabolic growth of technology in the last 20 years. The funny thing is, in my opin. is that actually we aren't technologically superior enough now or what will be in the near future. By this I mean, is the cords you carry, like I carry, really should be obsolete by now. Why? NASA, the government, and many other groups COULD create better technology. They choose not to (or at least sell it to the masses). Why? So that when the latest iPad comes screaming out we all go crazy over it. Government and the powers that be really don't want us to advance too quickly with better technology--really ecofriendly, etc. Social progress prevents their parabolic growth of returns, if you will. Anyways, I'm ranting. On a computer. Find me though some day, with tech I need, not want--and I do believe I may get that simpler dream. Or not.

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #146: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Issue: May 9, 2016

Story: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Rating: $

Review: I feel like this is a somewhat tired technique, straight out of Creative Writing 101: write a story consisting of three or four different snapshots or snippets out of a character's life at different ages, sort of like a series of written photographs. Fun perhaps, but strikes me as a bit amateurish. However, I also think L'Heureux succeeds here by pushing it a bit further, playing with the character's tentative attempts at something close to faith -- in childish, adult, and mature adult ways -- and tying all three "Short Moments" together in a subtle and readily decipherable way.

L'Heureux's prose and his frank humor and his ability to glorify and find the meaning in the mundane events and thoughts of every day life, and thereby turn the life of an ordinary person into a drama with meaning and significance puts me in mind of John Irving. As well a…

Water Review: San Pellegrino 250ml Bottle

Damn you, tiny little bottle of San Pellegrino. So little. So cute. But what are you really good for other than to make me wish I had a full bottle of Pellegrino? 
Good as a palate cleanser after a nice double espresso, I will give it that. But little else. The suave yet chaotic burst of Pellegrino bubbliness is still there, but with each sip you feel the tragedy of being that much closer to the end of the bottle, that much faster.

This is a bottle of water made specifically for the frustrated, for the meticulous, for the measurers among us with a penchant for the dainty. This water does not love you in the wild, on a sunny porch or with the raucous laughter of friends. No...much the opposite. Whatever that may be.

Best drunk in tiny, tiny sips, while forcing oneself through an unreadable and depressing Russian novel one does not want to read but feels one should, on a cold, wet day in December that promises four months of gloom and depression...or in pairs or threes and poured over …

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…