Skip to main content

Movie Review: Sherlock Holmes II

Let me start by giving this film the most entry-level (though not easily earned) piece of praise I can give a movie: I got my money's worth.

This isn't normally the kind of film I'd shell-out hard-earned money to go see in the theatre, but I've been seeing a lot of movies lately and, well, you have to see what's there and what you're on time to see.

Anyway, this is just a really fun, action-packed buddy film. Set in a sort of "steam-punk"1891 Europe, the film takes place between London, Paris, and Switzerland, as Holmes, Watson, and a female gypsy they pick up along the way, follow the infamous Professor Moriarty across the continent as he attempts to start a war. Moriarty, as it turns out, has been secretly building up a munitions factory in central Europe, with which he plans to supply the warring armies. The film turns out to be sort of a criticism of the Military-Industrial Complex which has so altered the shape of Geo-Politics in the past 70 odd years. Moriarty, it seems, was about 20 or 25 years too early...and his character even says as much at one point during the film, that war between the European powers is inevitable, and all he has to do is wait.

Most of the cerebral element of the old Arther C. Doyle Sherlock Holmes stories has been removed. There are no long, drawn-out explanations of how Holmes solves the crimes: such sequences are reduced to almost frantically choppy sequences of Holmes spotting various clues and piecing the answer together in a matter of five seconds. However, we do get some careful glimpses into Holmes' psychology later in the film as he solves the last riddle.

And, lest I forget, the chemistry between Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law makes this movie especially fun. Downey always brings a sort of frenetic, comedic madness to whatever he plays, and Law has a sort of dignified, innocent pluck: Downey plays the mad, eccentric, fiercely adventurous Holmes while Law plays his more even-keeled & sometimes reluctant partner in crime. Together they balance each other out in the tradition of all great Buddy Films: despite their differences in personality, the strength of their friendship makes them a great team and ultimately saves them from ruin. balance out the machismo inherent in a film with two (three, actually) big leading male roles, you need a strong female counterpart. The film definitely gets that in Naomi Rapace, who plays the wild, dark, swashbuckling gypsy whose brother has become trapped in Moriarty's scheme. Rapace (Mdm. Simza(?)) tags along with Holmes and Watson and provides--well--something nice to look at, as well as helping the boyz take down Moriarty in the end.

So...I say two thumbs up. When you shell out for a film like this, you know what to expect. Having said that, the film exceeded my expectations. Visually it had a lot to offer, with dark, quick, well-done camera work, and it was the series has become more of an action series than a mystery series. AND you even get the little underlying anti-war, anti-Military-Industrial Complex message. Not bad for what might otherwise get passed-off as a must-miss box office release.


Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #146: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Issue: May 9, 2016

Story: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Rating: $

Review: I feel like this is a somewhat tired technique, straight out of Creative Writing 101: write a story consisting of three or four different snapshots or snippets out of a character's life at different ages, sort of like a series of written photographs. Fun perhaps, but strikes me as a bit amateurish. However, I also think L'Heureux succeeds here by pushing it a bit further, playing with the character's tentative attempts at something close to faith -- in childish, adult, and mature adult ways -- and tying all three "Short Moments" together in a subtle and readily decipherable way.

L'Heureux's prose and his frank humor and his ability to glorify and find the meaning in the mundane events and thoughts of every day life, and thereby turn the life of an ordinary person into a drama with meaning and significance puts me in mind of John Irving. As well a…

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…

Water Review: San Pellegrino 250ml Bottle

Damn you, tiny little bottle of San Pellegrino. So little. So cute. But what are you really good for other than to make me wish I had a full bottle of Pellegrino? 
Good as a palate cleanser after a nice double espresso, I will give it that. But little else. The suave yet chaotic burst of Pellegrino bubbliness is still there, but with each sip you feel the tragedy of being that much closer to the end of the bottle, that much faster.

This is a bottle of water made specifically for the frustrated, for the meticulous, for the measurers among us with a penchant for the dainty. This water does not love you in the wild, on a sunny porch or with the raucous laughter of friends. No...much the opposite. Whatever that may be.

Best drunk in tiny, tiny sips, while forcing oneself through an unreadable and depressing Russian novel one does not want to read but feels one should, on a cold, wet day in December that promises four months of gloom and depression...or in pairs or threes and poured over …