Skip to main content

New Yorker Fiction Reviews: "Collectors" by Daniel Alarcon

Each week I review the short fiction from a recent issue of The New Yorker. You would too, if you were me...

Issue: July 29, 2013

Story: "Collectors"


Plot: Two Mexican men, from completely different walks of life, meet in the country's most infamous prison, Collectors, in the mid-80s. Rogelio is a poor, illiterate campesino turned drug courier; Henry is a playwright who wrote a politically inflammatory play called "The Idiot President," which apparently the government did not find too amusing. Despite their different backgrounds, the two bond in prison through a kind of symbiotic relationship; Rogelio helps Henry survive, Henry provides Rogelio intellectual stimulation. They perform "The Idiot President" in prison; Henry and Rogelio have a romantic relationship. Eventually Henry is released, only to find out that Rogelio and most of the prisoners he knew were killed when a massive prison riot gets quashed by the military.

Review: Yet another story from a writer due out with a second novel soon (and whose first novel Lost City Radio, I've had gathering dust on my shelf for two years). Someday when I get around to it (ha!) I'm going to tally up how many short stories come from young writers whose "second novel" is coming out soon. What is it about the NYer and "second" novelists? My guess is this: a.) if you even make it to second novel territory, then you're a proven commodity and won't be an embarrassment to the august, revered publication about which I faithfully blog, and b.) following on that logic, if your first novel was good, then your publisher has by now put some serious marketing muscle (read: $$$) behind you and therefore your agent -- who is doubtless friends with at least somebody on the NYer -- finagles you a few pages. That's my two cents worth of peanut gallery literary-world speculation. Amen. 

Anyway on to the review... 

Some short stories are like satisfying but unremarkable meals: they provide nourishment and some amount of pleasure, but ultimately you crap them out and forget all about them. Sadly, I would have to put "Collectors" into that category. In fact, I could barely even remember that I'd read this story, then I saw my issue of the NYer lying on the back of my toilet. Okay, sorry, too may toilet references for one blog post...

I can't put my finger on precisely why this story is forgettable, mind you. Alarcon manages to sort of extrude Rogelio's character very carefully and very evenly in a short amount of time. He also creates an intriguing scenario in which Henry has to cope with criminals and lower class types which he's been able to avoid throughout his entire, rarified intellectual upper-class life. One feels his anxiety as he has to fight every day to stay alive and keep his own paralyzing fear at bay.

I also find it intriguing any time fiction goes "meta," in other words, when the characters within the story engage in the act of literary production. You always have to watch this closely because it's rare that whatever work of art the characters are producing is done by accident. Either it's a reference to the production of the actual work at hand, or else it's a reference to some other societal issue. In this case it's particularly interesting from the standpoint that not only is the main character a playwright, but he gets his play produced in prison by prisoners. It's funny to note that, in the "outside world" Henry's actors don't really "get" his play but just want to act, and in prison it's much the same phenomenon. For a closer reading that, you'll have to take up where I've left off.

Another plus: the story ends on a really beautiful, bittersweet note, with Henry -- years later -- learning of the massacre of his former prison unit, and realizing that part of his life is now completely sealed in his past, with no one left alive that he knew during that time, and no one in his present life who could ever possibly understand what it was like inside prison. The story is worth reading just for that one passage.

All is well that end's well...except in fiction. I don't believe you can just jump around, do whatever you want, and then tie the work up with an emotional, yet kind of un-earned, ribbon and hope it moves people. No. In my opinion, it's the opposite: if the entire story is moving and gripping all along, it almost doesn't matter what happens in the end. Herein lies the lesson from "Collectors," I believe. 

Until next time...



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…

Holiday Q&A, Volume 1

These questions come to us from Grace. Thanks for sending your questions!! Answers below:
What is the most thrilling mystery you have read and/or watched?
The Eiger Sanction (book and film) by Trevanian is what's coming to mind. International espionage. Mountain-climbing assassins. Evil albino masterminds. Sex. Not a bad combination. Warning, this is completely a "guy" movie, and the film (feat. Clint Eastwood) is priceless 70s action movie cheese. But in case that's your thing...
What's the deal with Narcos?
Narcos is a Netflix show about the rise and fall (but mostly the fall) of Columbian cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar. Thus far there are two seasons of 10 episodes each. RIYL: The film Blow, starring Johnny Depp; the book Zombie City, by Thomas Katz; the movie Goodfellas; true crime; anything involving the drug trade. My brief review: Season 1 started out a bit slow and I know a bunch of people who never made it past the first few episodes. Some of the acting is a…

A Piece of Advice I Learned From My Grandfather

My grandfather was one of the most learned men I know. He read widely and voraciously, and not just in the sciences (he was a doctor); he loved politics, philosophy, and great literature as well. Whenever he finished a book he would write his thoughts about the book in the front cover and then sign and date it. To this day every once in a while I will open a book from my bookshelf or my mother's bookshelf, or at one of my family members' homes, and there will be my grandfather's handwriting. He was also a great giver of his books; if you remarked that you liked a particular one or wanted to read it, you were almost sure to take it home with you.

Reading is a very solitary pursuit but my grandfather was not a solitary person. He relished having family and friends around him which is convenient because he was blessed with a lot of both. And he carried out his intellectual life in a very "public" way as well. He was, in some ways, an intellectual evangelist. If he r…