Skip to main content

New Yorker Fiction Reviews: "Collectors" by Daniel Alarcon

Each week I review the short fiction from a recent issue of The New Yorker. You would too, if you were me...

Issue: July 29, 2013

Story: "Collectors"


Plot: Two Mexican men, from completely different walks of life, meet in the country's most infamous prison, Collectors, in the mid-80s. Rogelio is a poor, illiterate campesino turned drug courier; Henry is a playwright who wrote a politically inflammatory play called "The Idiot President," which apparently the government did not find too amusing. Despite their different backgrounds, the two bond in prison through a kind of symbiotic relationship; Rogelio helps Henry survive, Henry provides Rogelio intellectual stimulation. They perform "The Idiot President" in prison; Henry and Rogelio have a romantic relationship. Eventually Henry is released, only to find out that Rogelio and most of the prisoners he knew were killed when a massive prison riot gets quashed by the military.

Review: Yet another story from a writer due out with a second novel soon (and whose first novel Lost City Radio, I've had gathering dust on my shelf for two years). Someday when I get around to it (ha!) I'm going to tally up how many short stories come from young writers whose "second novel" is coming out soon. What is it about the NYer and "second" novelists? My guess is this: a.) if you even make it to second novel territory, then you're a proven commodity and won't be an embarrassment to the august, revered publication about which I faithfully blog, and b.) following on that logic, if your first novel was good, then your publisher has by now put some serious marketing muscle (read: $$$) behind you and therefore your agent -- who is doubtless friends with at least somebody on the NYer -- finagles you a few pages. That's my two cents worth of peanut gallery literary-world speculation. Amen. 

Anyway on to the review... 

Some short stories are like satisfying but unremarkable meals: they provide nourishment and some amount of pleasure, but ultimately you crap them out and forget all about them. Sadly, I would have to put "Collectors" into that category. In fact, I could barely even remember that I'd read this story, then I saw my issue of the NYer lying on the back of my toilet. Okay, sorry, too may toilet references for one blog post...

I can't put my finger on precisely why this story is forgettable, mind you. Alarcon manages to sort of extrude Rogelio's character very carefully and very evenly in a short amount of time. He also creates an intriguing scenario in which Henry has to cope with criminals and lower class types which he's been able to avoid throughout his entire, rarified intellectual upper-class life. One feels his anxiety as he has to fight every day to stay alive and keep his own paralyzing fear at bay.

I also find it intriguing any time fiction goes "meta," in other words, when the characters within the story engage in the act of literary production. You always have to watch this closely because it's rare that whatever work of art the characters are producing is done by accident. Either it's a reference to the production of the actual work at hand, or else it's a reference to some other societal issue. In this case it's particularly interesting from the standpoint that not only is the main character a playwright, but he gets his play produced in prison by prisoners. It's funny to note that, in the "outside world" Henry's actors don't really "get" his play but just want to act, and in prison it's much the same phenomenon. For a closer reading that, you'll have to take up where I've left off.

Another plus: the story ends on a really beautiful, bittersweet note, with Henry -- years later -- learning of the massacre of his former prison unit, and realizing that part of his life is now completely sealed in his past, with no one left alive that he knew during that time, and no one in his present life who could ever possibly understand what it was like inside prison. The story is worth reading just for that one passage.

All is well that end's well...except in fiction. I don't believe you can just jump around, do whatever you want, and then tie the work up with an emotional, yet kind of un-earned, ribbon and hope it moves people. No. In my opinion, it's the opposite: if the entire story is moving and gripping all along, it almost doesn't matter what happens in the end. Herein lies the lesson from "Collectors," I believe. 

Until next time...



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #146: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Issue: May 9, 2016

Story: "Three Short Moments in a Long Life" by John L'Heureux

Rating: $

Review: I feel like this is a somewhat tired technique, straight out of Creative Writing 101: write a story consisting of three or four different snapshots or snippets out of a character's life at different ages, sort of like a series of written photographs. Fun perhaps, but strikes me as a bit amateurish. However, I also think L'Heureux succeeds here by pushing it a bit further, playing with the character's tentative attempts at something close to faith -- in childish, adult, and mature adult ways -- and tying all three "Short Moments" together in a subtle and readily decipherable way.

L'Heureux's prose and his frank humor and his ability to glorify and find the meaning in the mundane events and thoughts of every day life, and thereby turn the life of an ordinary person into a drama with meaning and significance puts me in mind of John Irving. As well a…

Water Review: San Pellegrino 250ml Bottle

Damn you, tiny little bottle of San Pellegrino. So little. So cute. But what are you really good for other than to make me wish I had a full bottle of Pellegrino? 
Good as a palate cleanser after a nice double espresso, I will give it that. But little else. The suave yet chaotic burst of Pellegrino bubbliness is still there, but with each sip you feel the tragedy of being that much closer to the end of the bottle, that much faster.

This is a bottle of water made specifically for the frustrated, for the meticulous, for the measurers among us with a penchant for the dainty. This water does not love you in the wild, on a sunny porch or with the raucous laughter of friends. No...much the opposite. Whatever that may be.

Best drunk in tiny, tiny sips, while forcing oneself through an unreadable and depressing Russian novel one does not want to read but feels one should, on a cold, wet day in December that promises four months of gloom and depression...or in pairs or threes and poured over …

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…