Skip to main content

Guinness International Champions Cup Final: Man Utd. vs. Liverpool

On Monday night Manchester United and Liverpool played-out the final of the Guinness International Champions Cup, a pre-season tournament between eight of the top European club teams contested on American soil. Great not only for the promotion of soccer in the U.S. but a welcome fix for burgeoning soccer junkies who can't wait until the start of the English Premier League season.

Liverpool seemed to dominate the first half; every 30 seconds it seemed like striker Raheem Sterling was racing down the left side of the field, getting open for a thru ball and getting at least a run on goal if not a shot. But alas, he never put one in. Liverpool's only score in the half came from a Stephen Gerrard penalty kick in the 14th minute. 

Manchester United came back after the half and almost immediately began to dominate the game. Wayne Rooney and Juan Mata scored within three minutes of each other (55' & 58'), lifting Man U to 2-1. The final nail in coffin came much later in the game, off Jessie Lingard's foot. Final score: 3-1.

Some Observations: 

Since my main exposure to soccer over the past 10 years has been World Cup match play -- and little else -- I'm woefully ill-versed in club football. Since the world cup ended I've seen two full matches, an MLS game between Sporting KC and Phila Union, and Man Utd. v. Liverpool, and bits of a few MLS games here and there. The difference in play between World Cup soccer and club soccer is pretty pronounced, in my mind. I'm sure there will be salty old soccer fans out there who will scoff at this, but here goes:
Club soccer, for the most part, seems to be played faster and sloppier. To whit: it's more fun to watch. The players seem to attack the ball more, make more lunges, intercept more passes, get beaten more, and a goal doesn't seem quite as much like Manna from Heaven as a logical part of the game. Why is this? My guess is, since a random club match rarely carries the Do-or-Die consequences of a World Cup match, the players feel a bit more free to play the game and make mistakes. Also, club teams practice together and play together year-round, therefore they know each others habits and strengths. Sub-consciously I'm guessing this makes them more comfortable on the field and therefore more willing to take chances. 

Anyway, aside from the thrill of Country vs. Country and the high-stakes of the World Cup, I'm frankly having a lot more fun watching club soccer than the Copa de Copas. There's a certain constipation, a tight-shouldered grimacing tension about World Cup matches. Every goal counts 100 times more than normal, every match seems like it's do-or-die. That's fun and all, but even as a fan it can be exhausting. I'm finding club soccer much more fun to watch, in general, which is a good thing because the World Cup isn't coming back for four years...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…

Holiday Q&A, Volume 1

These questions come to us from Grace. Thanks for sending your questions!! Answers below:
What is the most thrilling mystery you have read and/or watched?
The Eiger Sanction (book and film) by Trevanian is what's coming to mind. International espionage. Mountain-climbing assassins. Evil albino masterminds. Sex. Not a bad combination. Warning, this is completely a "guy" movie, and the film (feat. Clint Eastwood) is priceless 70s action movie cheese. But in case that's your thing...
What's the deal with Narcos?
Narcos is a Netflix show about the rise and fall (but mostly the fall) of Columbian cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar. Thus far there are two seasons of 10 episodes each. RIYL: The film Blow, starring Johnny Depp; the book Zombie City, by Thomas Katz; the movie Goodfellas; true crime; anything involving the drug trade. My brief review: Season 1 started out a bit slow and I know a bunch of people who never made it past the first few episodes. Some of the acting is a…

A Piece of Advice I Learned From My Grandfather

My grandfather was one of the most learned men I know. He read widely and voraciously, and not just in the sciences (he was a doctor); he loved politics, philosophy, and great literature as well. Whenever he finished a book he would write his thoughts about the book in the front cover and then sign and date it. To this day every once in a while I will open a book from my bookshelf or my mother's bookshelf, or at one of my family members' homes, and there will be my grandfather's handwriting. He was also a great giver of his books; if you remarked that you liked a particular one or wanted to read it, you were almost sure to take it home with you.

Reading is a very solitary pursuit but my grandfather was not a solitary person. He relished having family and friends around him which is convenient because he was blessed with a lot of both. And he carried out his intellectual life in a very "public" way as well. He was, in some ways, an intellectual evangelist. If he r…