Skip to main content

New Yorker Fiction Reviews: "Inventions" by Isaac Bashevis Singer

Issue: Jan. 26, 2015

Story: "Inventions"

Author: Isaac Bashevis Singer

Rating: $/Meh

Review: I can't recall ever being overly thrilled or even mildly impressed when the New Yorker digs up and publishes a "lost" manuscript from a well-known but deceased writer; and here I'm thinking specifically of "Paranoia" by Shirley Jackson, from the Aug. 5, 2013 issue, TGCB 8/23/13). "Inventions," written in 1965 by the late Isaac Bashevis Singer -- who died in 1991 -- does nothing to change my mind on that. I can understand why certain craggy, cobweb-strewn nooks of the literary/academic world might thrill at the publication of one of Singer's lost stories, but I can't say I'm among that group of people.

Furthermore, for the story to even make sense on the first read (or even the first few reads (I know...I tried)) I'd have to to be way, way more fluent in my pre-WWII Soviet history than I am. I'd have to know and understand the difference between a Trotskyite, a Leninist, and a Stalinist, and to know why each of those groups might hate each other and why a Polish Communist theoretician -- like the story's main character Morris Krakower -- might have a crisis of consciousness after dreaming (or was he dreaming??) that his blankets were being repeatedly pulled off of him on a winter night and that he saw the ghost of an old colleague who had "disappeared" after returning to Russia and espousing some unpopular beliefs.

The following passage provides great clarity to what is otherwise an almost impossibly subtle story that would take me an hour's worth of Google searches to even pretend that I understand:

" was all a dream. If that were not the case, he, Morris Krakower, would have to surrender everything: Communisim, atheism, materialism, the Party, all his convictions and commitments. And what would he do then?...There are facts that a man must disown, even to himself. There are secrets one must take to the grave."

This passage provides a sort of codex to understanding the rest of the story, in case you (like me) weren't able to properly grasp it the first time. Krakower has his faith in Communism shaken by one night of bad dreams dredged up by his subconscious mind and discovers, perhaps, that his beloved philosophy of Communism cannot explain certain spiritual disturbances that seem very, very real. His choice is simple: either delve into that explainable spiritual realm and abandon Communism, or pretend it doesn't exist and stick to the known, the facts. He chooses the latter, and the next day after his dreams, his speeches are less vehement, he is shaken. Perhaps his Communism is at odds with what's inside of him, but he will likely spend the rest of his life trying to either bring the two together, or ignore that schism.

Okay, so I suppose I do "get" the message here. I'm just saying it would be much more profound, would have been much more profound, to people with a deeper understanding of the paranoia, guilt, secrecy, and subversiveness of early Soviet Communism, or if this had been a novel and Singer had had the time and space to unravel a narrative that explained it all. Again, I say that to a certain audience, I'm sure this is an extremely moving tale, but to me it's a story about a crisis of conscience wrought by a bad dream.

Meta-Fiction Alert: Proving that meta-fiction is with us now, always has been with us, and always will be with us, "Inventions" is told by a narrator who is also an author (aye)  during one of his own sleepless nights as he remembers a character that has lived inside his head for years. The narrator also relates to us one of his own dreams, about being trapped in a dank basement and seeing antler-like growths coming out of his arm.


Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review: "The Apologizer" by Milan Kundera

Issue: May 4, 2015

Rating: $$

Review: It took me five years and three separate attempts to finish Milan Kundera's famous novel, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, but in spite of that, quotes and insights from that book still rattle round my head on a weekly basis. What I mean to say is: my feelings on Kundera are very similar to my feelings on Haruki Murakami. I enjoy reading his work, but in small doses, like this short story.

Like Murakami, Kundera uses elements of magical realism, but where in a Murakami story you might encounter a flying dolphin or a disappearing hotel or a person who has lived his whole life in the same room, refusing to leave, Kundera's magical realism offers more direct insights and perspective on real life.

In Kundera's worlds, time and space are malleable and everything that ever happened in history is happening at the same time, and the narrator is a completely omniscient, caring, witty, and hands-on god-like being.

And so it is with "The Apo…

New Yorker Fiction Reviews: "Meet the President!" by Zadie Smith

Each week I review the short fiction from a recent issue of The New Yorker. If you told me when I was 12 that I'd be doing this I'd have been like, "Dork. There's no such thing as blogs," and I'd have been right...

Issue: Aug. 12 & 19, 2013

Story: "Meet the President!"

Author:Zadie Smith

(Please note: I've developed a highly sophisticated grading system, which I'll be using from now on.  Each story will now receive a Final Grade of either READ IT or DON'T READ it. See the bottom of the review for this story's grade...after you've read the review, natch.)

Plot: Set in England, far into the future (lets say 2113) a privileged youth of 15, named Bill Peek, encounters a few poor villagers from a small, abandoned coastal town on the southeast shore. He meets a little girl named Aggie, who is going to her sister's funeral. Peek is cut-off from real life by a sophisticated video game system that is implanted in his head, therefore th…

A Piece of Advice I Learned From My Grandfather

My grandfather was one of the most learned men I know. He read widely and voraciously, and not just in the sciences (he was a doctor); he loved politics, philosophy, and great literature as well. Whenever he finished a book he would write his thoughts about the book in the front cover and then sign and date it. To this day every once in a while I will open a book from my bookshelf or my mother's bookshelf, or at one of my family members' homes, and there will be my grandfather's handwriting. He was also a great giver of his books; if you remarked that you liked a particular one or wanted to read it, you were almost sure to take it home with you.

Reading is a very solitary pursuit but my grandfather was not a solitary person. He relished having family and friends around him which is convenient because he was blessed with a lot of both. And he carried out his intellectual life in a very "public" way as well. He was, in some ways, an intellectual evangelist. If he r…