Skip to main content

New Yorker Fiction Review #133: "The Philosophers" by Adam Erlich Sachs

Issue: Feb. 1, 2016

Story (novel excerpt): "The Philosophers" by Adam Erlich Sachs

Rating: $$

Review: I'm normally not a fan of the novel excerpt appearing in The New Yorker being passed off as a short story. First, I don't like being overtly "teased" into buying someone's book. Second, and most importantly I suppose, when I sit down to read a short story in the NYer, I sit down to involve myself in a complete end-to-end experience. Having said all that, I can forgive the NYer this time, because Adam Erlich Sachs's piece "The Philosophers" is so abstract that it doesn't really matter where the beginning or the end lies. And also, it's the NYer Fiction section after all, not the Short Story section. But as Marty DeBergi said: "Enough of my yakkin. Let's boogie..."

This piece is part of a larger novel called Inherited Disorders due out in May, which apparently explores the relationships between fathers and sons throughout generations, as does this excerpt, in an academic family in which there was a great and world-renowned philosopher. But this is not some kind of deep emotional yarn that spins out over hundreds of years or whatever, instead, Sachs has broken the family history up into brief, bite-size nuggets each with a different and somewhat abstract take the dysfunction that gets passed down through the generations. For example, one of the pieces of the story contains a description of a professor who wears a different hat every time he needs to explore his father's writings from a different perspective. At some point he ends up carrying around 20 different hats with him, and spends most of his time switching around between the different hats rather than doing any research.

There are no specific observations and insights in this story that have that "stick with you for the rest of your life" quality that I look for in great literature, but it is astoundingly well-crafted. What do I mean by well-crafted? It's easy to just throw that out there. What I mean, specifically is:

1.) His writing never feels like "writing," because he absorbs you into his world quickly and makes you forget you're reading a story. This is not easily accomplished, and it starts with consistency of voice and includes (among other things) faith in your reader to fill in certain gaps, but not too too many gaps. A delicate thing, for sure.

2.) You can sense the effect he's going for, and he achieves it. More and more I see attempts at these quasi-magical types of stories that fall flat. Sachs's even-handed and intellectual approach just works somehow; it's a bike that rolls smoothly.

3.) The different refracted views of his subject matter allow the larger "point" to be delivered without Sachs actually having to come out and "say" anything, which is another problem I have with so-called Literature...often we are told what to feel or think about a subject rather than shown. The old "Show vs. Tell" truism rearing it's ugly head.

Read this story because, if nothing else, it's a master class on how to handle the "abstract story from different viewpoints" form that many writers attempt and fail to accomplish. And also, I think we might have a great literary mind emerging here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review: "The Apologizer" by Milan Kundera

Issue: May 4, 2015

Rating: $$

Review: It took me five years and three separate attempts to finish Milan Kundera's famous novel, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, but in spite of that, quotes and insights from that book still rattle round my head on a weekly basis. What I mean to say is: my feelings on Kundera are very similar to my feelings on Haruki Murakami. I enjoy reading his work, but in small doses, like this short story.

Like Murakami, Kundera uses elements of magical realism, but where in a Murakami story you might encounter a flying dolphin or a disappearing hotel or a person who has lived his whole life in the same room, refusing to leave, Kundera's magical realism offers more direct insights and perspective on real life.

In Kundera's worlds, time and space are malleable and everything that ever happened in history is happening at the same time, and the narrator is a completely omniscient, caring, witty, and hands-on god-like being.

And so it is with "The Apo…

New Yorker Fiction Reviews: "Meet the President!" by Zadie Smith

Each week I review the short fiction from a recent issue of The New Yorker. If you told me when I was 12 that I'd be doing this I'd have been like, "Dork. There's no such thing as blogs," and I'd have been right...

Issue: Aug. 12 & 19, 2013

Story: "Meet the President!"

Author:Zadie Smith

(Please note: I've developed a highly sophisticated grading system, which I'll be using from now on.  Each story will now receive a Final Grade of either READ IT or DON'T READ it. See the bottom of the review for this story's grade...after you've read the review, natch.)

Plot: Set in England, far into the future (lets say 2113) a privileged youth of 15, named Bill Peek, encounters a few poor villagers from a small, abandoned coastal town on the southeast shore. He meets a little girl named Aggie, who is going to her sister's funeral. Peek is cut-off from real life by a sophisticated video game system that is implanted in his head, therefore th…

A Piece of Advice I Learned From My Grandfather

My grandfather was one of the most learned men I know. He read widely and voraciously, and not just in the sciences (he was a doctor); he loved politics, philosophy, and great literature as well. Whenever he finished a book he would write his thoughts about the book in the front cover and then sign and date it. To this day every once in a while I will open a book from my bookshelf or my mother's bookshelf, or at one of my family members' homes, and there will be my grandfather's handwriting. He was also a great giver of his books; if you remarked that you liked a particular one or wanted to read it, you were almost sure to take it home with you.

Reading is a very solitary pursuit but my grandfather was not a solitary person. He relished having family and friends around him which is convenient because he was blessed with a lot of both. And he carried out his intellectual life in a very "public" way as well. He was, in some ways, an intellectual evangelist. If he r…