Skip to main content

Football vs. Soccer

No, this is not a debate about the merits of The Sport of American Football vs. The Sport of Soccer. This is a debate about whether the sport we know as "soccer" in the U.S. should be called soccer or football, by an enthusiast living here in the U.S.

First, not many people realize this, but the word soccer comes from an abbreviation of the term, Association Football, which was what soccer was first called in England to distinguish it from rugby football, which is apparently also called football by really old people in the U.K. How you get to the word "soccer" from the words "Association Football" is beyond me. But you can see the "soc" there in the word "association." Anyway, it seems that in the U.K. people use football and soccer interchangeably, with a heavy preference for the word football.

So, can and should a U.S. soccer fan refer to soccer as football? Here's my take:

Reasons for it:

1.) If you look at the game itself, it really makes a lot more sense to refer to soccer as "football" than it does to call American Football "football." To me this is an air-tight argument.

2.) The game is called "football" or "futbol" literally everywhere else in the world except the U.S. and Canada. So in an effort to be culturally aware, when you sit down to watch an English Premier League game, you really are correct saying that you are watching "football."

3.) It's also just fun to purposely fly in the face of accepted terminology once in a while. But be wary, you will ruffle some feathers with this. Get into a bar or a heated conversation and start throwing the word "football" around for soccer, and you will get some flak. If enough alcohol is involved, and you're in the wrong place, you may get into a fight.

4.) Related to #2 I suppose, but calling the game "football" is a way to express a connection with the deep heritage and tradition of the game, and with your millions of brothers and sisters around the world who follow it as well.

Reasons against it:

1.) There is something to be said for speaking in your own vernacular. Regardless what they do in the rest of the world, the American word for soccer is soccer, and what we mean when we say football is American Football. If you spent the first 10 - 12 years of your life in America, try as you might, you will never undo this syntactic connection in your brain. It's impossible to fight it and, kind of ridiculous unless you can ever lay claim to having grown up in a foreign country. Plus, if you want to be understood and not have to explain yourself all the time, you just call it soccer.

2.) Unless you're doing it out of spite or stubbornness (perfectly valid reasons) it's a bit of a pretentious affection. Would you walk around calling soccer "calcio" because that's what they call it in Italy? Or would you call a flashlight a "torch" or your running shoes your "trainers" and expect to be taken seriously? No. And neither can any American who calls soccer "football" without a mischievous gleam in his eye.

The Verdict:

Call it whatever you want and own it. Just know that you will suffer the consequences such as a.) people thinking you're pretentious, and b.) having to explain yourself. I've gone through a phase of referring to it as "football" but that quickly disappeared because it confuses non-soccer fans too easily and, I'm American, I live in America, and therefore I speak American English. Once I stopped remembering to call soccer football, I quickly reverted to calling it soccer, and always will.

That said I highly encourage you to pepper the word "football" in there whenever you get the chance, in reference to soccer. It's fun to throw people off and it may even start some interesting conversations or bar fights.

Comments

Grace McQueeny said…
After living in Ireland, I got very used to called soccer "football." I don't plan on going back.

HOLIDAY Q. What is something that is "trending" that you're really not into?

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker Fiction Review #151: "The Bog Girl" by Karen Russell

From the June 20 issue...

My loyal readers (if there are still any, which I doubt) will know I'm usually not a fan of Magical Realism, which, as you may also know, is Karen Russell's stock in trade. That said, there's nothing I love more than having my antipathy for magical realism shattered by an awesome story like "The Bog Girl."

Briefly, an Irish teenager discovers the body of a young woman who as been buried in a bog for over 2,000 years and begins to date her. What more do you need, right? If I'd read that one-line description somewhere else, and wasn't on a mission to review every New Yorker short story, I doubt I'd have read "The Bog Girl." But maybe I should start doing a George Costanza and do the opposite of everything I think I should do.

Where Russell succeeds here is in two main areas: 1.) Making us really love Cillian, the teenager who falls in love with the bog girl, and 2.) pulling the unbelievable trick making the characters…

Holiday Q&A, Volume 1

These questions come to us from Grace. Thanks for sending your questions!! Answers below:
What is the most thrilling mystery you have read and/or watched?
The Eiger Sanction (book and film) by Trevanian is what's coming to mind. International espionage. Mountain-climbing assassins. Evil albino masterminds. Sex. Not a bad combination. Warning, this is completely a "guy" movie, and the film (feat. Clint Eastwood) is priceless 70s action movie cheese. But in case that's your thing...
What's the deal with Narcos?
Narcos is a Netflix show about the rise and fall (but mostly the fall) of Columbian cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar. Thus far there are two seasons of 10 episodes each. RIYL: The film Blow, starring Johnny Depp; the book Zombie City, by Thomas Katz; the movie Goodfellas; true crime; anything involving the drug trade. My brief review: Season 1 started out a bit slow and I know a bunch of people who never made it past the first few episodes. Some of the acting is a…

A Piece of Advice I Learned From My Grandfather

My grandfather was one of the most learned men I know. He read widely and voraciously, and not just in the sciences (he was a doctor); he loved politics, philosophy, and great literature as well. Whenever he finished a book he would write his thoughts about the book in the front cover and then sign and date it. To this day every once in a while I will open a book from my bookshelf or my mother's bookshelf, or at one of my family members' homes, and there will be my grandfather's handwriting. He was also a great giver of his books; if you remarked that you liked a particular one or wanted to read it, you were almost sure to take it home with you.

Reading is a very solitary pursuit but my grandfather was not a solitary person. He relished having family and friends around him which is convenient because he was blessed with a lot of both. And he carried out his intellectual life in a very "public" way as well. He was, in some ways, an intellectual evangelist. If he r…